I am starting to get used to this without becoming angry. Multiple gullible, naive, and incurious "reporters" ask Jesse Ventura why he has questions about the official government fairytale explanation for the collapse of WTC 1, 2, and 7 on 911. He reminds them repeatedly that they are the ones that are supposed to be asking questions. "Why am I doing your job?" he asks them. Why indeed? As usual the callow "reporters" have an answer that matches what their government told them for every inconsistency or physical impossibility Jesse Ventura points out in the official rubber-stamped report . Perhaps if the "reporters" had taken time away from their TV sets to research the questions Jesse elucidates they would share his skepticism. Instead, we have the usual gaggle of uninformed and credulous parrots wondering aloud what in the world Jesse is talking about. Here are just a few "questions" the "reporters" posed that have nothing to do with zeroing in on the truth - they are the same ones repeated by those ignorant of the most basic facts surrounding the questions posed by Jesse Ventura and the 911 truth movement. Perhaps that is what irritates me the most when I hear mainstream press "reporters" interviewing 911 truth advocates - they are usually the most uninformed and ill-prepared interviewers out there. Rather than critically examining and carefully studying the issues raised, these "reporters" simply repeat what their government told them. That seems to me to be the antithesis of the most basic traits required for a good reporter - skepticism, curiosity, intelligence and the ability to think independently and critically. None of the reporters in this video meet those basic criteria.

Example 1

    One reporter illogically appeals to authority when he tells Jesse that "engineers" said the intensity of the heat and the blast from the plane knocked the insulation off the steel girders. Did he ask these engineers? What temperature is "intense?" At what temperature does steel melt? Why doesn't that matter to him but it does if one wishes to melt steel? He repeatedly says "I'm not an engineer." Does this reporter need to be proficient in every occupation if he is to report on it? Doesn't his common sense become relevant at some point? Jesse asks him what happened to the insulation on the girders of WTC7 which was not hit by a plane?

Example 2

    The reporters don't know the difference between a statesman and a politician - I refer them to a dictionary.

Example 3

    The "reporter" in the green shirt asks Jesse why if he "doesn't have any evidence" why he continues to ask questions if it "risks" causing more damage to the family members. What? The family members are the ones asking for the truth- in fact without them there would have been no 911 investigation at all. If the "reporter" sees no evidence he simply hasn't looked for it - it is overwhelming.

    While these reporters seem to demonstrate critical thinking skills evaluating what Jesse has to say - they exercise none of those skills evaluating the fairy tale their government told them. As Jesse says - they are in the "My government right or wrong" crowd.